In the book modern history entitled of Letters Upon The Aesthetic Education of Man 1794 written by J.C Friedrich Von Schiller from 1759 until the years 1805 tell about the beauty of women. Schiller was a German intellectual history, not only poetry and drama.beliau design is aphilosophy that to convince people about the beauty of the place and human life inaesthetic education.
In this letter there is research on human beings, especially women beauty. This research does not sin because he is not biased in this mazhab. Idea is not used in the methods ofart, but through reading. Beauty can handle all the women in the world. The root of the problem is due to the beauty before moving all his desires.But the voice of our time does not mean that seems favorable to the arts, all the kinds of arts events to the investigation as directed. Course of events gave orders to the geniusof time that threatens to remove the further from the ideal of art. For art has to leavereality, it has to raise itself above the body needs and neediness; for art is the daughterof freedom, and it requires a prescription and regulations need to be given by the spiritand not by the matter. But in our day it is necessity, neediness, which remains, andhuman-bend under the iron yoke. Utilities are idols of the time, that all powers dohomage and all subjects are low. In this great balance of utility, the spiritual service of arthas no weight, and not to be encouraged all, it disappeared from the noisy Vanity Fair of our time. The spirit of philosophical inquiry itself will damage the imagination of onepromise after another, and the narrow boundaries of art, in part to limit exaggeratedscience.
To the establishment and the freedom of true ploitical can be moral or Archive as the world can say the people are higher morals and philosophy into a challenging spirit. It became a challenge for all types of events art.In book, he says, "For art to leave reality, it has to improve his body on the needs and neediness; for art is the daughter of freedom,and it requires a prescription and the rules given by the spirits of the requirements and not by the matter ". why it is said to have left the reality of art, it has to raise itself abovethe body needs and neediness? In my mind, I think it is because art is not thoughtpractical in life, but for those who think that way it will raise themselves to the needs andneed.In confidense freedom, it will have the prescription and regulation within us tomake our freedom archives our It's like no other matters that govern your life.Man is not better treated by nature in his first start than her other works are; so long as he is unable to act for himself as an independent intelligence, she acts for him. But the very fact that constitutes him a man is, that he does not remain stationary, where nature has placed him, that he can pass with his reason, retracing the steps nature had made him anticipate, that he can convert the work of necessity into one of free solution, and elevate physical necessity into a moral law.
This prop is not found in the natural character of man, who, being selfish and violent, directs his energies rather to the destruction than to the preservation of society. Nor is it found in his moral character, which has to be formed, which can never be worked upon or calculated on by the lawgiver, because it is free and never appears. It would seem therefore that another measure must be adopted. It would seem that the physical character of the arbitrary must be separated from moral freedom; that it is incumbent to make the former harmonise with the laws and the latter dependent on impressions; it would be expedient to remove the former still farther from matter and to bring the latter somewhat more near to it; in short to produce a third character related to both the others - the physical and the moral - paving the way to a transition from the sway of mere force to that of law, without preventing the proper development of the moral character, but serving rather as a pledge in the sensuous sphere of a morality in the unseen.
I admit that in a one-sided estimate from the point of view of morality this difference vanishes, for the reason is satisfied if her law prevails unconditionally. But when the survey taken is complete and embraces the whole man (anthropology), where the form is considered together with the substance, and a living feeling has a voice, the difference will become far more evident. No doubt the reason demands unity, and nature variety, and both legislations take man in hand. The law of the former is stamped upon him by an incorruptible consciousness, that of the latter by an ineradicable feeling. Consequently education will always appear deficient when the moral feeling can only be maintained with the sacrifice of what is natural; and a political administration will always be very imperfect when it is only able to bring about unity by suppressing variety. The state ought not only to respect the objective and generic but also the subjective and specific in individuals; and while diffusing the unseen world of morals, it must not depopulate the kingdom of appearance, the external world of matter.
It is true that the consideration of opinion is fallen, caprice is unnerved, and, although still armed with power, receives no longer any respect. Man has awaked from his long lethargy and self-deception, and he demands with impressive unanimity to be restored to his imperishable rights. But he does not only demand them; he rises on all sides to seize by force what, in his opinion, has been unjustly wrested from him. The edifice of the natural state is tottering, its foundations shake, and a physical possibility seems at length granted to place law on the throne, to honour man at length as an end, and to make true freedom the basis of political union. Vain hope! The moral possibility is wanting, and the generous occasion finds an unsusceptible rule.
As a conclusion, each of the human action in life is a part of aesthetic.It is because the actions are followed by their perspective and experience in reality.Instead of that, it can called the beauty of stream life. Why i said like that ?because all of the action are the prosses to live in reality life. So, the human life is beautiful and cannot denied it.
No comments:
Post a Comment