DEBATE (NEGATIVE) MATHEMATICS SUBJECTS SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN BACHELOR DESIGN OF ANIMATION

           I strongly disagree with affirmative group that mathematics subjects should be included in Bachelor Design of Animation Program. In animation, student should be focus in arts subjects only because this course arts subjects is very important. Student must be remember of principle in design that this topic only have in arts subjects. If student take the mathematics subject, they cannot focus in arts subjects and project that they produced will be not value or not have quality. For example is cartoon movie like strange and cannot be sale.
          My second point is mathematics subjects do not have study more on in this course because student do not have calculate before and after drawing. So arts students just know about basic mathematics only that they have learn in primary school and secondary school. Besides that, they should not be taken mathematics subjects again in degree. For example they just know about plus, divided and multiplication.
          Lastly, my points is mathematics subjects cannot give students anything in this course. Why i said that ? This is because student will be forget what have they learn in mathematics subjects. After graduate, student in animation program will be drawing in a long time and everywhere if they want. Most important is they search money or get sallary throught drawing not in calculate. For example, is they drawing and then sale this drawing to people will interested with a expensive price. So, mathematics subjects is nothing to student bachelor of animation program as compared with arts subjects.

CRITIQUE CHALLENGE

                               

                               

          For the critique challenge assigment in design aesthetic course, i have to make an aesthetic evaluation upon animation video. The choosen animation is Hikayat Sang Kancil dan Monyet and Hikayat Sang Kancil dan Buaya. The criterion has been set based on relativism. The criteria are i.e :

1. Audience should be able to remember half of the video after a long time as compared to Hikayat Sang

    Kancil dan Buaya.

2. Audience should be able to laught out immediately as compared to Hikayat Sang Kancil dan Buaya.

3. Audience should be able to finish watching the animation from the beginning to the end voluntarily as

    compared to Hikayat Sang Kancil dan Monyet.

4. Audience should be able to feel nostalgic to the extent that they remeber their old story as compared to

    Hikayat Sang Kancil dan Buaya.

            I say this because this animation to give a lesson to all society. Besides that, the advice of friends must be received by faith that we act and dont be stubborn. These lessons will be remembered by the society, especially poor children. The second critique why i say that because the animation of Hikayat Sang Kancil dan Monyet is funny better than Hikayat Sang Kancil dan Buaya. The part was very funny that audience can see is when the monkey eat chillies. This monkey feel so hot and run away.

       The third critique why i say that because the animation of Hikayat Sang Kancil dan buaya is can give audience blur and dont know what to happen at crocodile and mousedeer. The mousedeer is very clever to manage the crocodile that will eat him. It is very dangerous for mousedeer but the crocodile have been cheat of mousedeer. Last critique that i say that because most people cannot accept the others advantages. So, this lessons must be happen to sum of people.

        I disagree with yellowflash4.blogspot.com say when audiens should be annoyed with the manner of the monkey instantly when he disturb the turtoise and the mousedeer. This is because monkey have his own right to make a discussion. So, audience should be understand that the monkey was hunger and neeed some food to life. I also was disagree with his opinion when he say audiens should be touched with the friendship between the character instantly after watching the animation. If for me, this relationship is normal and should not touched by audience. Mousedeer should be friend with monkey because the size body monkey like same with mousedeer. Not like turtoise, his size body was smaller than mousedeer. Turtoise should be friend with small animal like him.

QUIZ

EMOTIONAL DESIGN_..Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things

           Although this book is a product of the 1980's, its essential premise is not dated nor obsolete. Dr. Norman vividly illustrates the good and bad of design, and provides an excellent guidebook for the understanding of basic user-centric design in products, fixtures, software, and the everyday things that make up our world. This book for anyone interested in the design and creation of software, architecture, or consumer products. You will find some dated, quaint information within its pages, such as the descriptions of the "computer notepad" and hypertext (both of which came to fruition with Palm Computers and the Web), but, as a whole, the book is a collection of relevant, interesting material. It is an excellent starting point for the study of design.

           Did you ever wonder why cheap wine tastes better in fancy glasses? Why sales of Macintosh computers soared when Apple introduced the colorful iMac? New research on emotion and cognition has shown that attractive things really do work better, as Donald Norman amply demonstrates in this fascinating book, which has garnered acclaim everywhere from Scientific American to The New Yorker. Emotional Design articulates the profound influence of the feelings that objects evoke, from our willingness to spend thousands of dollars on Gucci bags and Rolex watches, to the impact of emotion on the everyday objects of tomorrow.Norman draws on a wealth of examples and the latest scientific insights to present a bold exploration of the objects in our everyday world. Emotional Design will appeal not only to designers and manufacturers but also to managers, psychologists, and general readers who love to think about their stuff.

        Donald Norman is famous for The Design of Everyday Things – a best-selling study of the need for functionality in consumer product design. It’s no good having tea pots that don’t pour properly, chairs you can’t sit in, or doorknobs that don’t open the door. This is his follow up to that study, in which he revises his views. He confesses that he had previous under-rated the importance of emotions and aesthetics, in writing The Design of Everyday Things I didn’t take emotions into account. But now I have changed . Sure, utility and usability are important, but without fun and pleasure, joy and excitement. our lives would be incomplete. Along with our emotions, there is one other point as well: aesthetics, attractiveness, and beauty.

         The first part of the book is actually concerned with the psychology of our response to objects. He suggests that we perceive them at a visceral, behavioural ,and a reflective level. That is Do I like it? Does it work? and Will I use it again? The first is instinctive, the second rational, the third a combination of experience and cultural influence, rather like the super-ego. The second part of the book applies these principles to product design. His examples range from mineral water bottles to web sites, and from hiking boots to industrial vacuum cleaners. What he does here is to emphasise the desirability of good shape and satisfying textures. The rest is a repeat of what he argued in the earlier book. The product must work easily, and ideally it should be tested for usability (presumably by a company such as the Nielsen-Norman Group).

           He is still generally on the side of functionality, but now appears to be prepared to defend the appeal of glamorous surfaces. However, you do begin to wonder about his judgements when he gets excited about owning one of those Martian-looking Philippe Starck lemon juicers which even the designer confesses were “not designed to squeeze lemons [but] to start conversations.” He gets so carried away that when he comes to analyse the social interactions of text messaging and mobile phone conversations, it’s hard to see what it has to do with design, and much of what he has to say should be fairly obvious to everyone conversant with their advantages and limitations.

          He eventually blends this interest in emotions and design by considering the future of robots which have been programmed to have emotions. Not necessarily human emotions, but appropriate for their function and survival. Strangely enough, the rationale for all this is given in an epilogue which traces the development of his professional career. He has latterly been working with psychologists and now sees that human choices are made on more than functionality alone. [One wonders whether his business partner, the ultra-functionalist Jakob Nielsen is persuaded by this approach.]

        This is a lively, thought-provoking study of design principles. Donald Norman writes in a friendly, jargon-free style, and he communicates a humane enthusiasm for his subject. I doubt that this will dislodge The Design of Everyday Things from the top of the Design Classics list, but it is one which anyone with an interest in design will not want to miss.
            In conclude, mostly this book explain about the basic tools of emotional design. Attractive things do work better. Attractiveness produces positive emotions, causing mental processes to be more creative, more tolerant of minor difficulties. The three levels of processing lead to three corresponding forms of design, the visceral, behavioural and reflective. Each plays a critical role in human behaviour, each equally critical role in design, marketing and use of product.

DESIGN AESTHETIC

  In the book modern history entitled of Letters Upon The Aesthetic Education of Man 1794 written by J.C Friedrich Von Schiller from 1759 until the years 1805 tell about the beauty of women. Schiller was a German intellectual history, not only poetry and drama.beliau design is aphilosophy that to convince people about the beauty of the place and human life inaesthetic education.

         In this letter there is research on human beings, especially women beauty. This research does not sin because he is not biased in this mazhab. Idea is not used in the methods ofart, but through reading. Beauty can handle all the women in the world. The root of the problem is due to the beauty before moving all his desires.But the voice of our time does not mean that seems favorable to the arts, all the kinds of arts events to the investigation as directed. Course of events gave orders to the geniusof time that threatens to remove the further from the ideal of art. For art has to leavereality, it has to raise itself above the body needs and neediness; for art is the daughterof freedom, and it requires a prescription and regulations need to be given by the spiritand not by the matter. But in our day it is necessity, neediness, which remains, andhuman-bend under the iron yoke. Utilities are idols of the time, that all powers dohomage and all subjects are low. In this great balance of utility, the spiritual service of arthas no weight, and not to be encouraged all, it disappeared from the noisy Vanity Fair of our time. The spirit of philosophical inquiry itself will damage the imagination of onepromise after another, and the narrow boundaries of art, in part to limit exaggeratedscience.

         To the establishment and the freedom of true ploitical can be moral or Archive as the world can say the people are higher morals and philosophy into a challenging spirit. It became a challenge for all types of events art.In book, he says, "For art to leave reality, it has to improve his body on the needs and neediness; for art is the daughter of freedom,and it requires a prescription and the rules given by the spirits of the requirements and not by the matter ". why it is said to have left the reality of art, it has to raise itself abovethe body needs and neediness? In my mind, I think it is because art is not thoughtpractical in life, but for those who think that way it will raise themselves to the needs andneed.In confidense freedom, it will have the prescription and regulation within us tomake our freedom archives our It's like no other matters that govern your life.Man is not better treated by nature in his first start than her other works are; so long as he is unable to act for himself as an independent intelligence, she acts for him. But the very fact that constitutes him a man is, that he does not remain stationary, where nature has placed him, that he can pass with his reason, retracing the steps nature had made him anticipate, that he can convert the work of necessity into one of free solution, and elevate physical necessity into a moral law.

           This prop is not found in the natural character of man, who, being selfish and violent, directs his energies rather to the destruction than to the preservation of society. Nor is it found in his moral character, which has to be formed, which can never be worked upon or calculated on by the lawgiver, because it is free and never appears. It would seem therefore that another measure must be adopted. It would seem that the physical character of the arbitrary must be separated from moral freedom; that it is incumbent to make the former harmonise with the laws and the latter dependent on impressions; it would be expedient to remove the former still farther from matter and to bring the latter somewhat more near to it; in short to produce a third character related to both the others - the physical and the moral - paving the way to a transition from the sway of mere force to that of law, without preventing the proper development of the moral character, but serving rather as a pledge in the sensuous sphere of a morality in the unseen.

            I admit that in a one-sided estimate from the point of view of morality this difference vanishes, for the reason is satisfied if her law prevails unconditionally. But when the survey taken is complete and embraces the whole man (anthropology), where the form is considered together with the substance, and a living feeling has a voice, the difference will become far more evident. No doubt the reason demands unity, and nature variety, and both legislations take man in hand. The law of the former is stamped upon him by an incorruptible consciousness, that of the latter by an ineradicable feeling. Consequently education will always appear deficient when the moral feeling can only be maintained with the sacrifice of what is natural; and a political administration will always be very imperfect when it is only able to bring about unity by suppressing variety. The state ought not only to respect the objective and generic but also the subjective and specific in individuals; and while diffusing the unseen world of morals, it must not depopulate the kingdom of appearance, the external world of matter.

         It is true that the consideration of opinion is fallen, caprice is unnerved, and, although still armed with power, receives no longer any respect. Man has awaked from his long lethargy and self-deception, and he demands with impressive unanimity to be restored to his imperishable rights. But he does not only demand them; he rises on all sides to seize by force what, in his opinion, has been unjustly wrested from him. The edifice of the natural state is tottering, its foundations shake, and a physical possibility seems at length granted to place law on the throne, to honour man at length as an end, and to make true freedom the basis of political union. Vain hope! The moral possibility is wanting, and the generous occasion finds an unsusceptible rule.

                As a conclusion, each of the human action in life is a part of aesthetic.It is because the actions are followed by their perspective and experience in reality.Instead of that, it can called the beauty of stream life. Why i said like that ?because all of the action are the prosses to live in reality life. So, the human life is beautiful and cannot denied it.